Of Christmas decorations and electroshock therapy


When this holiday season is over and you've exhausted your patience, credit card, and yule spirit, here's something to ponder while you attempt to surgically remove tangles of lights from the prickly brown death trap that's become your Christmas tree.

Question:
Lots of little computers woven together in ever-changing patterns, connecting and reconnecting, sharing information at lightning speed--quick, what are we talking about? That's too easy, you say, the answer is the internet. Or, if you've been reading this website for a while and you're a smart aleck, the Victorian telegraph system.

Or, if you've got good pattern recognition and you're familiar with the premise of this blog, the human brain as revealed to us through neuroscience.

It's not a perfect analogy but it's been on my mind since reading this month's Discovery Magazine. Carl Zimmer, award-winning biology writer and author of The Tangled Bank: An Introduction to Evolution has an interesting article in there about the brain and depression. Much of his focus is on the rebirth of ECT, commonly known as Electroconvulsive shock therapy.

ECT is kind of like the mental health equivalent of using leeches to stem bloodflow. It conjures images of the medical world's hazy, barbaric past. We think of electroschock and we picture Jack Nicholson as McMurphy in "One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest," enduring a "therapy session" that feels more like torture. Zimmer assures us that ECT has come a long way since the 1950's and can actually be a reasonable treatment in certain cases--again, like leeches. (It's worth pointing out that doctors now now anesthitize the patients before applying the electricity. Also, leeches carry an anesthetic right there in their spit, although the actual level of pain depends on the size and strength of the individual leech.)

What struck me about Zimmer's article wasn't so much that ECT has shown value in patients with severe depression (they're still not really sure why Electroconvulsive shock works), but new insight about what goes on in the brain of someone suffering from severe depression.

Thanks to fMRI technology, we might think of the brain as Zimmer describes it: "The brain regions are like self-contained computers, the brain as a whole is a computer network. The activity in one region is influenced by neurons sending signals from other regions. This communication can lead two regions to work together closely. When one region is active, so is the other, when one is quiet, the other tends to be as well."

Based on work done by University of Aberdeen neuroscientists Ian Reid and Christian Schwarzbauer, along with the findings of Yvette Sheline at Washington University, we've learned that depressed people show hyper-connective activity between the left dorsalateral prefrontal cortex and other regions. Essentially, they are talking about a wiring overload at the area just behind your eyes, the home of your rational processing center. Imagine way too many strings of Christmas lights hooked up to the same outlet.

So, how do we reduce the strain and take some of those lights down, so to speak? For certain people, you can prune over-connectivity through advanced anti-depressants. For some, physiotherapy works. For others, meditation can get the job done. And now it appears ECT may be another option. Schwarzbauer says, "By getting rid of those hyper-connections, ECT might let depressed people get out of their own heads."

The real question is what causes some of us to hyper-connect in the first place. For that matter, why do many of us wrap so many strands of lights around our trees, even knowing we'll have to untangle them again in a week? And the answer in both cases: so far it's still a mystery.

Check out Robb’s new book and more 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more