Shattering the Three Myths of Expertise


In the last twenty years we’ve learned a tremendous amount about how expertise is created. Scientists like K Anders Ericsson from Florida State University have been leading the charge. His new book, Peak, Secrets from the new Science of Expertise chronicles years of experiments examing how expertise is attained across a wide spectrum of domains.

Ericcson’s findings shatter three commonly held myths about experts.


The first myth—

Talent is bestowed upon you by winning the genetic lottery.  Many people believe that their IQ, for example, is fixed and nonmalleable, as is their abilities in sports, mathematics, the arts and so on. In other words, you’re either born with talent or you're not. Repeated research has shown that IQ, like early talent in a given domain, has very little causal relationship to the level of expertise you can eventually attain.  

Acquiring expertise, instead, shows a one to one correlation with the kind and quality of your training program. Ericsson calls it ‘deliberate practice,’ the intense and specific training protocols an individual can follow to realize steady incremental improvement. With deliberate practice, it’s possible to radically improve your skills in any field, even raise your IQ.

 Given the neuroplasticity of the brain, with the right coaching, time commitment, and practice program, your abilities are only constrained by your ‘rage to master,’ your inner drive to achieve. In 1991 Susan Polgar was the first woman to become a Chess Grandmaster having followed a well-documented deliberate practice regime. Prior to that it was thought that only men possessed the ability to compete in chess at the world-class level.


The second myth—

If you do something long enough you’ll get much better at it. It’s not uncommon to hear companies tout their bona fides by adding the sum total of their employee’s years of experience.  But there’s a problem with using this kind of sound bite to prove expertise.

Ericsson cites the results of 60 medical doctors studies which show the longer a doctor is in practice the lower his or her quality of performance becomes.  How can this be? Its because unless a doctor follows a deliberate path for attaining new knowledge and skill acquisition, the technology and constant updating and revising of medical information passes them by.

Doctors show the same tendency seen in many fields, a fast learning curve of improvement, followed by a leveling off, followed by a period of stagnation, which eventually leads to a decline in their knowledge and skill set. Like the one time award winning car salesman who fails to keep up with the new state of the art hybrid engine technology, doctors can often become dinosaurs in their own field too.


The third myth—

 If you want to improve, all you have to do is put in a more effort. More effort equals greater reward. “Try harder” is an admonishment uttered by countless parents, coaches and sales managers. Ericsson says, ‘The reality is, however, that all of these things— managing, selling, teamwork— are specialized skills, and unless you are using practice techniques specifically designed to improve those particular skills, trying hard will not get you very far.”


The bottom line: ­ expertise is an effortful process that requires you to push the boundaries of your comfort zone, constantly adjusting as the body of knowledge changes, and requires the never ending pursuit of skill acquisition.


Check out Robb’s new book and more 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more