What Copernicus Can Tell Us About Your Company's Staying Power


In 1543, Polish astronomer and mathematician Copernicus published a then-radical theory, carefully timed just before his death: the Renaissance-era scientist had come to the conclusion that the Earth rotated around the sun. At the time, the implication that the Earth did not sit at the center of the universe was a deeply disturbing one. However, later on, this belief would prove extremely useful—for instance, when we began developing space-worthy crafts with which to explore the heavens.
Over four centuries later, a tourist touched a wall and wondered how long it would stand. The man in question was astrophysics professor J. Richard Gott, the wall was the Berlin Wall, and the professor was about to have a revelation, thanks in part to Copernicus.
Gott’s reasoning was this: in the same way that we are not the epicenter of the solar system, this moment and his presence were in no way integral to the history of the wall. This meant there was an equal chance he was standing there at the first quarter of its existence, the second quarter, the third quarter, or the final quarter. Since there was a 25% chance of inhabiting each quarter, there was a 50% chance of inhabiting the two middle quarters. According to this theory, it meant there was a 50% chance of the wall lasting between one-third or three times its age. The year was 1969; the wall had stood for eight years.

Plugging in the numbers, Gott found a 50% chance the wall would come down between about 1972 and 1993. When the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, it landed well within Gott’s range. An astrophysicist with no special knowledge of Germany, communism, or geopolitical situations had made a surprisingly sharp prediction, using only some simple math and a certain existential humility. Gott’s Principle (sometimes called the Copernican Principle) was born.

Now some caveats: if Gott had been invited to the Berlin wall due to some sort of globally important political talk, the moment in time would not be random, and thus Gott’s probabilities wouldn’t apply.
Additionally, Gott’s Principle is only useful when it comes to predicting a timespan you don’t know. For instance, let’s say you’re sitting through minute sixty of a very boring movie. If you tried to use Gott’s Principle, you’d get a 50% chance the movie would continue for between twenty minutes and three hours. Given that the average movie these days is maybe 2 hours, unless you’re watching the collected Lord of the Rings trilogy, it’s highly unlikely that the movie would have a total runtime of four hours. It’s similarly irrelevant calculating human lifespans.
However, when you need a tool to track the cultural staying power of Bach, Brittany Spears, or the latest meme, Gott’s got your back.



Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more