The Book Brain: How Reading Transforms Us



When you really think about it, the fact that you can read this sentence is nothing short of amazing.
In a fraction of a second, you are able to look at a series of complicated shapes, identify each one and connect it to several possible sounds, group those sound options together into units of words, connect each word-unit to one or more possible meanings, and then based on its relative position in a sentence, convert a series of lines and curves from simple visual stimuli into an abstract idea. And you are probably able to do this while also listening to music, eating a snack, or perhaps even both.
The written word is omnipresent in our modern lives, and these days it’s safe to say we take it mostly for granted. But, as Falk Huettig, Régine Kolinsky and Thomas Lachman note in their recent article, ‘Theculturally co-opted brain: how literacy affects the human mind,’ the very concept of rendering those ideas into a series of repeatable symbols is only about 6000 years old.
To put that into perspective, the modern human evolved into being roughly 200,000 years ago. The Neanderthal is thought to have died out around 40,000 years ago. The first undisputable evidence of domesticated wolves dates from circa 12,700 BCE. Over 8,000 years after that, we first gained the ability to commit our thoughts to paper—or rather, to clay, since paper didn’t exist yet.
Every time you crack open a book, peruse a menu, or actually bother to consult the manual, you are hijacking a series of brain systems that were not originally meant for such a purpose. “Pre-existing perceptual and cognitive skills must be recruited, modified and coordinated…” writes Huettig et al. “Complex perceptual and cognitive procedures are overlearned and become automatized with extensive practice over years.”
Because of this, we can say that reading literally rewrites the brain. And that seems to have overreaching effects.
For instance, by comparing test results between pre-literate children and beginning readers of the same age, and between literate people and illiterate people, researchers were able to prove that increased mirror-image discrimination (that is, being able to distinguish identical shapes based on their orientation) is a direct effect of developing the ability to read.
The article also cites a 2018 paper by José Morais, which argues that literacy itself can potentially have tremendous effects on one’s ability to analyze and organize thoughts, think critically, and facilitate well-informed public debate. Morais also reminds us that, according to UNESCO, about 15% of people 15 or older are functionally illiterate. (And that’s not even including certain individuals on twitter who may be able to string words together but clearly could still use a boost on the analysis and critical thinking end of things.)
So the next time you glance over your iTunes terms and conditions, take a moment to appreciate your ability to resolve those strange squiggles into words and thoughts. Reading may truly be the greatest brain hack of all.


Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more