Are Women Better at Reacting to Faces?



It’s an old stereotype that women can pick up on social nuances that men can’t. Ask a neuroscientist whether women are more adept at interpreting feelings from looking at people’s faces, and you’ll get a resounding yes. Or possibly, a resounding no. It turns out that it really depends which neuroscientist you ask.

To pick one example, in 2009, Olivier Collignon and his team from the Université de Montréal Centre de recherche en neuropsychologie et cognition (CERNEC) hired actors to portray the fear or disgust in front of 23 men and 23 women, all between the ages of 18 and 43. Participants then had to categorize each performance by emotion. This study found that women completed the assignment more accurately. Women also responded faster when judging the faces of other women.

However, that sample size of 46 might raise a few eyebrows when it comes to stating any solid, sweeping conclusions about the sexes.

On the other hand, a 1986 metanalysis by Peter Shapiro and Steven Penrod looked at 128 different facial recognition tests and found no overall appreciable difference in performance based on gender.

Enter K. Suzanne Scherf, Daniel B. Elbich and Natalie V. Motta-Mena. These Pennsylvania State psychologists organized a new study in 2017, combining behavioral tests with neuroimaging to try to settle this battle of the sexes once and for all.

The Penn State study carefully chose 116 young adults, 58 of whom were women, and all of whom were between the ages of 18 and 25. The subjects completed the long form version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test, a tool which measures the ability to pick out a male face out of a lineup of three faces. To eliminate any possible gender bias, the researchers also constructed a second version of the Cambridge Face Memory Test, which does the same thing but with female faces.

Next, 15 male participants and 15 female participants were selected to watch various film clips of objects and faces while having their brans scanned in an MRI machine. If men and women really did experience faces differently somehow, the psychologists figured, then some type of differences would surface in the neural scans when shown a face on a screen, be it the areas highlighted or activation strength.

Scherf et al published their results in a paper titled “Investigating the Influence of Biological Sex on the Behavioral and Neural Basis of Face Recognition.”
The short version? There was no influence. Men and women were equally good at picking out male and female faces, and the brain scans demonstrated no clear differences in how male brains or female brains react to faces.

While the relatively small sample size still complicates any definitive statement, on an evolutionary standpoint, it seems to make sense. “Our findings suggest that face recognition behavior…is not inherently sexually dimorphic,” says the paper. “Face recognition is an essential skill for navigating human social interactions, which is reflected equally in the behavior and neural architecture of men and women.”



Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more