The Hop on Pop Revolution


 
Reading to a toddler-aged child does more than just get them to sit still for a few minutes.

Led by James Law, Professor of Speech and Language Sciences in Newcastle University’s School of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, researchers found something interesting. According to a new study, when parents and other caregivers routinely read with small children, the result is a language advantage of eight months.

The researchers carefully reviewed sixteen reading intervention studies from the past 40 years, conducted in the USA, South Africa, Canada, Israel, and China. Some children were read to by a parent; some were read to by another caregiver. Some were read to from books; some were shown electronic readers. The average age of the child involved was 39 months.

The goal was to examine the effects on receptive language (the ability to understand words), expressive language (the ability to translate thoughts into words), and pre-reading skills (the ability to see how words are structured.) In each category, these children experienced an improvement. However, the most dramatic changes occurred in receptive language, resulting in a lead of eight months over other children.

One group of toddlers showed slightly more benefit than the rest: the socially disadvantaged.

Eight months is a huge gap when talking about preschoolers. It’s the difference between not being ready for elementary school, or acing kindergarten. Malcolm Gladwell’s book The Outliers would argue that this early bump could determine a child’s entire academic destiny: a student labeled as smart early on will garner more attention from parents and teachers, thus leading to a feedback loop that can last beyond college.

It’s true that some of Gladwell’s conclusions have drawn criticism from journalists. However, it is hard to deny that a child entering school with an eight-month lead will have a considerably easier time of things. And Professor Law himself notes, “This ability to understand information is predictive of later social and educational difficulties. And research suggests it is these language skills which are hardest to change.”

As politicians and educators continue to debate educational reform, it seems hard to believe that the solution could be as simple as promoting programs where parents and caregivers read, say, Hop On Pop to a three-year-old. No doubt a comprehensive solution must include a number of other steps.

Still, this research suggests that one thing shouldn’t be controversial: if you are parent or caregiver to a small child, it’s time to practice your best Dr. Seuss voices…



Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo...
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a...
Read more

The Top One Quality of True Leaders

Image
“So, what's up with the pile of words?” you ask. This is part of an experiment we conducted earlier this year on how to be the perfect leader. Sooner or later, most of us wind up in a position of some power, whether it’s running a cub scout den or a girl scout troop, heading up a committee at church or your job, or residing over your flamenco dance group or your flamingo lawn ornament club. And when you nobly accepted the challenge of being in charge, your brain released a little shot of cortisol, the stress hormone. In your moment of panic, you made the executive decision to discover the secret to being a good leader. If you were like me, you went down to your local bookstore and perused the aisles looking for books on leadership. After all, you wanted to be the best president the flamingo lawn ornament club had ever known, recognizing a club needs to be more than really swanky pink shirts. In my case, the bookstore anticipated my arrival and had at the ready a slew of...
Read more