Measuring the Unmeasureable


"Metric" is a kind of sexed up word for measurement, popular among the corporate crowd.  The interesting thing about "metric" is that it has moved beyond its institutional role, denoting a specific calculation, to one that implies actual value.

I can evaluate your sales output in dollars, but judging the impact of education on a sales force is a Herculean task. To that end, when budget time rolls around, a ‘soft asset’ like education is frequently eliminated. The devaluation of education is a common theme in corporate America, where the spreadsheet reigns supreme.

The operating assumption is that if it can’t be measured, it is expendable. Yet there is an obvious flaw here. Take, for example, a patient waiting in the emergency room with a migraine headache. Migraines can cause excruciating, near-unbearable pain. No one would argue they don't exist, but how does one go about measuring just how much it hurts?

Medical institutions sometimes attempt to answer this question by employing a 1-10 scale, with one representing relative comfort and 10 denoting agony.  The individual is asked to assess his or her level of pain against this scale.

On the face of it, this sounds like a cogent method. The problem is that there's zero frame of reference. After all, you can only have one headache at a time. And even if you suggest a number, how do you know your scale lines up with anyone else's?

 Since measuring sensation is anything but an exact science, it can be easy to dismiss.  No one would suggest that makes sense, especially the person in the emergency room. And it’s not just headaches. You can’t measure love or depression, or even the shifting momentum in a football game, yet they are clearly important. 

The spreadsheet, the fiscal benchmark of modern corporations, has limitations. It works well for the quantifiable, the left brain analytics. There is no comparable right brain, feelings-driven chart.  

 All evidence suggests that the emotional brain drives decision-making, while the rational brain only comes along for the ride. But applying analytics to a non-analytical entity is like measuring the distance between two objects only using hope. It works well in cartoons, but translates badly onto Excel.  

 No matter where you are, hope--like education--is vital. But making the argument with numbers can be a challenge.

The truth is corporate managers will continue to sing the praises of education and then slash it from the budget until they recognize a simple truth: that which defies measurement doesn’t lack value. If that were the case, millions of people would lose hope.
 

Check out Robb’s new book and more 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more