What Makes Meetings So Terrible? The Asch Conformity Paradigm, For One Thing.


There is a special dialect unique to the corporate world. If you work at a big company, your brain might at this moment be reflexively conjuring phrases like think outside the box, best in class, customer-driven, emerging technologies and, my favorite, win-win, the latter being the antithesis of modern day sports.

However, what I'm talking about goes beyond buzzwords. I refer to the mythical language of meeting rooms, where no project is ever hampered by constraints on money, time and personnel, thanks to magical forces like “can-do attitude".

People often say the cruelest part of growing up is when we lose our childlike innocence and our ability to make-believe.  The jury's still out on innocence, but listen to anyone with sales projections for the upcoming year and you will quickly realize that pretending is alive and well.

Meeting rooms are where great ideas are hatched and untenable promises made. The harsh, sunlit world of the outside is where they go to die.

So what Ju-jitsu is at work here? Clearly people understand that the emperor isn’t wearing any clothes. Why does no one speak up?

When humans beings engage in the act of assessment and evaluation, whether it is about upcoming sales, production, or each other, the rules start to bend. The narrative we are likely to weave is overly positive.

We are hardwired to wake up each morning and, despite innumerable hardships, go back out there to fight the good fight. Running with the herd is a central strategy for survival. That primitive instinct is more or less intact today. In meeting rooms and boardrooms, we can start to act like sheep, herded by the strongest voices.

In a well-known experiment known as the Asch Conformity Paradigm, people were shown the following diagram, and asked to match the length of the standard line against the comparison lines.




Little did they know Solomon Asch had placed seven confederates in the room. One by one, each of the seven would make the same incorrect report. Then the eighth person, the test subject, would be asked for an opinion.

Placed in a room by themselves, test subjects answered correctly 99% of the time. But with those seven confederates muddying the waters, that figure plummeted to 25%.  This experiment has been repeated many times, with similar results.

The influence of the group has a profound effect on what we say and do.  We are unlikely to buck the crowd, especially when we know the people in question. And the paradigm isn't unique to meeting rooms. We're all guilty of laughing at jokes that aren't that funny or nodding along with an assertion that doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

Often, it's only after stepping away and getting a moment to ourselves that we rediscover our own good judgment. But by then it’s too late, having already bought into any number of bad ideas, strategies, or punchlines.

Next time you sit down at your meeting, beware the Asch Paradigm. It can bring a whole new meaning to the word ‘alignment.’

Check out Robb’s new book and more 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a
Read more

The Best Painkiller Isn't What You Think It Is

Image
When we say that listening to the right song makes us feel better, usually we mean it in terms of emotions. However, a new study from the University of Utah Health suggests that combining certain painkillers with certain music boosts the pain-fighting effect of the medication a measurable amount. This recent bit of research was conducted specifically on models recreating two types of pain: inflammatory and post-surgical. (Nerve pain, or neuropathic pain, was not addressed.) Low doses of four medications were explored: ibuprofen, cannabidiol, levetiracetam, and NAX 5055. As for music, the researchers went with one artist only, while the control groups were given one of the four drugs and subjected to white noise. What music would you choose for optimal painkilling effect? The experimenters went with Mozart. (Interestingly, the phrase “Mozart therapy” already exists, referring to the beneficial effect ol’ Amadeus can have on patients with epilepsy. For instance, a 2018 st
Read more