Decoding the Hidden Language of Your Eyeball


 
Previously, we’ve talked about how enlarged pupils can signify attention or arousal. If someone’s pupils dilate when you talk to them, conventional wisdom went, that means they’re very interested in what you have to say. It’s been speculated that this is why restaurants go in for mood lighting: the low light helps create the illusion that your dining companion is riveted, and thus increases the odds you’ll stay long enough to linger over that slice of cheesecake or extra glass of wine. However, it’s not so simple as looking into your date’s eyeball and reading their mind.
In a 2017 study, researchers from the University of Amsterdam and the University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf found that enlarged pupils can also be a sign of indecision.
Here’s how they support this conclusion: in a recent study, 27 subjects sat in a dark room in front of a computer screen, which displayed a series of problems. In each sequence, the participant had to make a judgement about dots moving across this screen, with varying difficulty levels. An infrared camera was there to measure pupil dilation as the subjects arrived at each choice—and waited three seconds to learn the correct result.
A clear pattern emerged: the greater the uncertainty about a given problem, the greater the pupil dilation. Those enlarged pupils were also more likely to show up when the participant gave a wrong answer, suggesting that dilation in this context is not a safeguard against making mistakes, but more a side effect of experiencing doubt.
What gives?
When you’re very focused on something, this can trigger a flood of modulatory neurotransmitters, like serotonin, dopamine, and noradrenaline. These chemical messengers influence communication between your neurons. However, this cocktail doesn’t just show up when your attention is riveted by a fascinating conversation; it also may be sparked by simple indecision.
This is not altogether shocking. Writer and psychologist Daniel Kahneman had already written about the link between pupil dilation and mental strain in his landmark book Thinking Fast and Slow. Give someone an easy multiplication problem and their pupils enlarge ever so slightly. Make them really go to town on a doozy of an equation and those pupils widen far more. Kahneman went so far as to write that, simply by watching a subject’s eyes, it was possible to predict the moment at which they’d give up on a math problem.
If we consider indecision to be another form of mental strain, then the 2017 findings square with what we already knew—although, of course, the experiment would need to be replicated with a sample size larger than 27 before we could positively affirm it.
Still, it’s something to think about the next time you’re out to dinner, eyes locked on your dining companion. Maybe their pupils are speaking the language of love, or maybe they’re simply pondering whether or not to order that cheesecake…




Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo...
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a...
Read more

Macaques, Mirror Neurons, and The Power of Smiles

Image
Feeling stressed? Having a bad day? Did you know that a monkey, a peanut and a hungry scientist might hold the answer to turning things around? Around 1997, some Italian neuroscientists in Parma were fooling around with a macaque monkey, trying to isolate the brain neuron that controlled the monkey’s elbow movement.  They hardwired the monkey’s brain with a sophisticated sound detection apparatus and then placed a bowl of peanuts in front of the monkey. Each time the monkey reached for a peanut, it triggered the elbow neuron, and the search was on. I’ll cut to the chase. After a morning of hard work, you can imagine their elation in hearing the loud click of the winner neuron.  The story goes that they then rushed off to lunch. In their haste, however, they forgot to unhook the monkey. When they returned, one of the scientists, apparently not fully sated (could it be that they don’t have hearty luncheon fare like Chef Boyardee in Italy?) reached into the monkey’s cage...
Read more