How Your Brain is Like a Snowflake

 
 
 
No two human brains are exactly alike. Or at least, that’s what neuroscientists have generally assumed.
After all, consider the highly specific combination of genetic intermixing that makes up your DNA. Consider neuroplasticity—how easily the brain can wire itself based on past experiences. Learning how to navigate a complicated city, mastering the violin, even keeping your arm in a cast for two weeks all leave an indelible mark on your gray matter. Now consider the tremendous variation in experiences, even among siblings of approximately the same age, growing up in the same family.
 
However, short of scanning every single brain out there, how can we reasonably conclude that brains truly follow the snowflake model of uniqueness?
 
Five researchers at the University of Zurich recently took up the task: Seyed Abolfazl Valizadeh, Franziskus Liem, Susan Mérillat, Jürgen Hänggi, and Lutz Jäncke. They chronicled their results in the descriptively titled (if not particularly catchy) paper, “Identification of individual subjects on the basis of their brain anatomical features.”
 
These researchers examined MRI brain scans from 191 subjects. The subjects were all right-handed, generally healthy, and between 64 and 84 years old (at least at the start of the procedure), with no history of neurological or psychiatric problems.
To measure and quantify variations among brain structures, the team pinpointed 450 different brain features to look at and used a new mathematical algorithm to track them all. If the individuals they studied truly hosted a unique amalgamation of brain matter, it would probably be possible to differentiate them based on these 450 points alone.  The researchers then developed a software pipeline (BrainPrint) to classify the various different brain scans.
So, what was their track record, based on 450 different data points across 191 brains? Using the software, the team was able to classify 99.8% of subjects, with no information beyond the scans.
“Based on their results,” the team writes, “the authors conclude that human brain structures are unique to individuals and can be used for subject identification.”
Essentially, you carry in your head a sort of autobiographical portrait, made up of a lifetime of brain activity—the sum of millions of decisions, thoughts, catastrophes, recoveries and feelings. How will you paint yours?

 
 

 
 


 

Check out Robb’s new book and more 
content at www.bestmindframe.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Robert Frost Quandary, or How Irrational Thinking Might Save Your Life

Image
You stumble out of the wilderness, having had no contact with humans for at least ten days. You’re weak from hunger and fatigue and you find yourself at a crossroads, power lines stretching out along each of the separate roadways. It’s decision time. You think about Robert Frost’s poem, and wonder if his advice to take the road less traveled might not just lead to your demise. What do you do, or more importantly, which brain system should you use to make this crucial decision? Daniel Kahneman, famed psychologist, winner of the Nobel prize for prospect theory and author of Thinking Fast and Thinking Slow might be the one guy to call, assuming your existential crossroads gets cellphone reception. Kahneman explains that we have two systems for making decisions. He refers to them simply as System 1 and System 2. System 1 is reflexive, automatic, and impulsive. It takes a constant reading of your surroundings and generates short-term predictions, all operating on a level beneath yo...
Read more

Who Are You: Does Personality Change as We Age?

Image
Are you the same “you” that you were twenty years ago? Thirty? Forty? What about fifty years ago? While science still struggles to quantify, measure, and categorize personality, some have a different question: how stable is personality in the first place? Do the high school version of yourself and the retiree version of yourself still have some common immutable core? It depends how you look at it , says a paper by lead author Rodica Damian of University of Houston and her co-authors Marion Spengler of the University of Tuebingen in Germany, Brent W. Roberts of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and UH grad student Andreea Sutu. The paper in question goes by the catchy title “Sixteen going on sixty-six: A longitudinal study of personality stability and change across 50 years.” Damian and her colleagues compared the results for 1,795 U.S. adults who had taken a personality test as teenagers and then again, five decades years later. The team found that yes, there is a...
Read more

Macaques, Mirror Neurons, and The Power of Smiles

Image
Feeling stressed? Having a bad day? Did you know that a monkey, a peanut and a hungry scientist might hold the answer to turning things around? Around 1997, some Italian neuroscientists in Parma were fooling around with a macaque monkey, trying to isolate the brain neuron that controlled the monkey’s elbow movement.  They hardwired the monkey’s brain with a sophisticated sound detection apparatus and then placed a bowl of peanuts in front of the monkey. Each time the monkey reached for a peanut, it triggered the elbow neuron, and the search was on. I’ll cut to the chase. After a morning of hard work, you can imagine their elation in hearing the loud click of the winner neuron.  The story goes that they then rushed off to lunch. In their haste, however, they forgot to unhook the monkey. When they returned, one of the scientists, apparently not fully sated (could it be that they don’t have hearty luncheon fare like Chef Boyardee in Italy?) reached into the monkey’s cage...
Read more